Talk:Slanted parentheses around dynamics: Difference between revisions
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: Yesterday at 22:19 by Lemzwerg in topic Is this Snippet Necessary?
→Is this Snippet Necessary?: Reply |
→Is this Snippet Necessary?: Reply |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
-- [[User:Ksnortum|Ksnortum]] ([[User talk:Ksnortum|talk]]) 16:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC) | -- [[User:Ksnortum|Ksnortum]] ([[User talk:Ksnortum|talk]]) 16:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
:IMHO the answer is no. <code>\parenthesize</code> doesn't allow the fine-tuning necessary to get good output with slanted | :IMHO the answer is no. <code>\parenthesize</code> doesn't allow the fine-tuning necessary to get good output with slanted text. It might sense, however, to improve the documentation, mentioning <code>\parenthesize</code>. -- [[User:Lemzwerg|Lemzwerg]] ([[User talk:Lemzwerg|talk]]) 06:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC) | ||
::Should I add my code to the snippet, or create an issue on the documentation? [[User:Ksnortum|Ksnortum]] ([[User talk:Ksnortum|talk]]) 15:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::Please directly modify the snippet. The next Wiki import eventually updates the LilyPond documentation. -- [[User:Lemzwerg|Lemzwerg]] ([[User talk:Lemzwerg|talk]]) 15:35, 1 February 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::Knute, the change itself looks good, thanks. However, the form must be adjusted to follow the guidelines in [[:Category:Included in the official documentation]]: only a single <code><nowiki><lilypond></nowiki></code> block is allowed for ‘official’ snippets. Please fix that. -- [[User:Lemzwerg|Lemzwerg]] ([[User talk:Lemzwerg|talk]]) 17:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::Fixed. [[User:Jean Abou Samra|Jean Abou Samra]] ([[User talk:Jean Abou Samra|talk]]) 18:38, 1 February 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::::Thanks! -- [[User:Lemzwerg|Lemzwerg]] ([[User talk:Lemzwerg|talk]]) 22:19, 1 February 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:19, 1 February 2026
Is this Snippet Necessary?
[edit source]Can't this be done without Scheme code?
\version "2.24"
\relative c'' {
\override Parentheses.font-size = #2
c4\parenthesize\f c c \dynamicUp c\parenthesize\p
}
-- Ksnortum (talk) 16:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- IMHO the answer is no.
\parenthesizedoesn't allow the fine-tuning necessary to get good output with slanted text. It might sense, however, to improve the documentation, mentioning\parenthesize. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 06:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)- Should I add my code to the snippet, or create an issue on the documentation? Ksnortum (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Please directly modify the snippet. The next Wiki import eventually updates the LilyPond documentation. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Knute, the change itself looks good, thanks. However, the form must be adjusted to follow the guidelines in Category:Included in the official documentation: only a single
<lilypond>block is allowed for ‘official’ snippets. Please fix that. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 17:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)- Fixed. Jean Abou Samra (talk) 18:38, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! -- Lemzwerg (talk) 22:19, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Fixed. Jean Abou Samra (talk) 18:38, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Knute, the change itself looks good, thanks. However, the form must be adjusted to follow the guidelines in Category:Included in the official documentation: only a single
- Please directly modify the snippet. The next Wiki import eventually updates the LilyPond documentation. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Should I add my code to the snippet, or create an issue on the documentation? Ksnortum (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)