Jump to content

Talk:Slanted parentheses around dynamics: Difference between revisions

Add topic
From LilyPond wiki
Latest comment: Yesterday at 22:19 by Lemzwerg in topic Is this Snippet Necessary?
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
:IMHO the answer is no.  <code>\parenthesize</code> doesn't allow the fine-tuning necessary to get good output with slanted text.  It might sense, however, to improve the documentation, mentioning <code>\parenthesize</code>. -- [[User:Lemzwerg|Lemzwerg]] ([[User talk:Lemzwerg|talk]]) 06:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
:IMHO the answer is no.  <code>\parenthesize</code> doesn't allow the fine-tuning necessary to get good output with slanted text.  It might sense, however, to improve the documentation, mentioning <code>\parenthesize</code>. -- [[User:Lemzwerg|Lemzwerg]] ([[User talk:Lemzwerg|talk]]) 06:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
::Should I add my code to the snippet, or create an issue on the documentation? [[User:Ksnortum|Ksnortum]] ([[User talk:Ksnortum|talk]]) 15:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
::Should I add my code to the snippet, or create an issue on the documentation? [[User:Ksnortum|Ksnortum]] ([[User talk:Ksnortum|talk]]) 15:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
:::Please directly modify the snippet.  The next Wiki import eventually updates the LilyPond documentation. -- [[User:Lemzwerg|Lemzwerg]] ([[User talk:Lemzwerg|talk]]) 15:35, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
::::Knute, the change itself looks good, thanks.  However, the form must be adjusted to follow the guidelines in [[:Category:Included in the official documentation]]: only a single <code><nowiki><lilypond></nowiki></code> block is allowed for ‘official’ snippets.  Please fix that. -- [[User:Lemzwerg|Lemzwerg]] ([[User talk:Lemzwerg|talk]]) 17:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
:::::Fixed. [[User:Jean Abou Samra|Jean Abou Samra]] ([[User talk:Jean Abou Samra|talk]]) 18:38, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
::::::Thanks! -- [[User:Lemzwerg|Lemzwerg]] ([[User talk:Lemzwerg|talk]]) 22:19, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:19, 1 February 2026

Is this Snippet Necessary?

[edit source]

Can't this be done without Scheme code?

\version "2.24"

  \relative c'' {
    \override Parentheses.font-size = #2
    c4\parenthesize\f c c \dynamicUp c\parenthesize\p
  }

-- Ksnortum (talk) 16:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

IMHO the answer is no. \parenthesize doesn't allow the fine-tuning necessary to get good output with slanted text. It might sense, however, to improve the documentation, mentioning \parenthesize. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 06:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Should I add my code to the snippet, or create an issue on the documentation? Ksnortum (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Please directly modify the snippet. The next Wiki import eventually updates the LilyPond documentation. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Knute, the change itself looks good, thanks. However, the form must be adjusted to follow the guidelines in Category:Included in the official documentation: only a single <lilypond> block is allowed for ‘official’ snippets. Please fix that. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 17:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Fixed. Jean Abou Samra (talk) 18:38, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! -- Lemzwerg (talk) 22:19, 1 February 2026 (UTC)Reply