Making cross-staff beams look better: Difference between revisions
Import snippet from LSR |
m Replace version="2.24.0" with version="2.24" now that the LilyWiki extension supports auto-selecting the latest release in a stable series |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Cross-staff beams may not look always good; this snippet demonstrates how to get better results. | Cross-staff beams may not look always good; this snippet demonstrates how to get better results. | ||
<lilypond version="2.24 | <lilypond version="2.24" full> | ||
%% http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=508 | %% http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=508 | ||
Revision as of 18:54, 16 November 2025
Cross-staff beams may not look always good; this snippet demonstrates how to get better results.
\version "2.24"
%% http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=508
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "RH" { \clef treble \time 3/4 s2.*2 }
\new Staff = "LH" { \clef bass \time 3/4 s2.*2 }
\context Staff = LH
\relative c' {
\stemDown % Change into \stemUp to fix the bug
c,8 [ g'
\change Staff = RH
d' a' e' b' ]
% This makes the second beam look much better.
\override Beam.concaveness = #0
b [ e, a, d,
\change Staff = LH
g, c, ]
}
>>
}
% Prevent bad cropping.
\markup \null
\paper { tagline = ##f }
