Talk:Creating “real” parenthesized dynamics: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 06:17 by Lemzwerg in topic Is this Snippet Necessary?
Rudi Guggt (talk | contribs) m →Is this Snippet Necessary?: lilypond-tag |
→Is this Snippet Necessary?: Reply |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
-- [[User:Ksnortum|Ksnortum]] ([[User talk:Ksnortum|talk]]) 16:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC) | -- [[User:Ksnortum|Ksnortum]] ([[User talk:Ksnortum|talk]]) 16:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
:IMHO the answer is no. <code>\parenthesize</code> doesn't allow the fine-tuning necessary to get good output with slanted objects. It might sense, however, to improve the documentation, mentioning <code>\parenthesize</code>. -- [[User:Lemzwerg|Lemzwerg]] ([[User talk:Lemzwerg|talk]]) 06:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:17, 1 February 2026
Is this Snippet Necessary?
Can't this be done without Scheme code?
\version "2.24"
\relative c'' {
\override Parentheses.font-size = #2
c4\parenthesize\f c c \dynamicUp c\parenthesize\p
}
-- Ksnortum (talk) 16:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- IMHO the answer is no.
\parenthesizedoesn't allow the fine-tuning necessary to get good output with slanted objects. It might sense, however, to improve the documentation, mentioning\parenthesize. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 06:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)