Talk:Slanted parentheses around dynamics: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: Yesterday at 15:25 by Ksnortum in topic Is this Snippet Necessary?
No edit summary |
→Is this Snippet Necessary?: Reply |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:IMHO the answer is no. <code>\parenthesize</code> doesn't allow the fine-tuning necessary to get good output with slanted text. It might sense, however, to improve the documentation, mentioning <code>\parenthesize</code>. -- [[User:Lemzwerg|Lemzwerg]] ([[User talk:Lemzwerg|talk]]) 06:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC) | :IMHO the answer is no. <code>\parenthesize</code> doesn't allow the fine-tuning necessary to get good output with slanted text. It might sense, however, to improve the documentation, mentioning <code>\parenthesize</code>. -- [[User:Lemzwerg|Lemzwerg]] ([[User talk:Lemzwerg|talk]]) 06:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC) | ||
::Should I add my code to the snippet, or create an issue on the documentation? [[User:Ksnortum|Ksnortum]] ([[User talk:Ksnortum|talk]]) 15:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:25, 1 February 2026
Is this Snippet Necessary?
Can't this be done without Scheme code?
\version "2.24"
\relative c'' {
\override Parentheses.font-size = #2
c4\parenthesize\f c c \dynamicUp c\parenthesize\p
}
-- Ksnortum (talk) 16:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- IMHO the answer is no.
\parenthesizedoesn't allow the fine-tuning necessary to get good output with slanted text. It might sense, however, to improve the documentation, mentioning\parenthesize. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 06:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)- Should I add my code to the snippet, or create an issue on the documentation? Ksnortum (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)