Talk:Slanted parentheses around dynamics: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: Yesterday at 17:03 by Lemzwerg in topic Is this Snippet Necessary?
→Is this Snippet Necessary?: Reply |
m Jean Abou Samra moved page Talk:Creating “real” parenthesized dynamics to Talk:Slanted parentheses around dynamics |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 18:31, 1 February 2026
Is this Snippet Necessary?
Can't this be done without Scheme code?
\version "2.24"
\relative c'' {
\override Parentheses.font-size = #2
c4\parenthesize\f c c \dynamicUp c\parenthesize\p
}
-- Ksnortum (talk) 16:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- IMHO the answer is no.
\parenthesizedoesn't allow the fine-tuning necessary to get good output with slanted text. It might sense, however, to improve the documentation, mentioning\parenthesize. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 06:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)- Should I add my code to the snippet, or create an issue on the documentation? Ksnortum (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Please directly modify the snippet. The next Wiki import eventually updates the LilyPond documentation. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Knute, the change itself looks good, thanks. However, the form must be adjusted to follow the guidelines in Category:Included in the official documentation: only a single
<lilypond>block is allowed for ‘official’ snippets. Please fix that. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 17:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Knute, the change itself looks good, thanks. However, the form must be adjusted to follow the guidelines in Category:Included in the official documentation: only a single
- Please directly modify the snippet. The next Wiki import eventually updates the LilyPond documentation. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Should I add my code to the snippet, or create an issue on the documentation? Ksnortum (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)